In his novel "Dubrovsky" A. S. Pushkin described the life of serfs, the tyranny of the landowners. He talks about a quarrel between two neighbors, landowners Troekurov and Dubrovsky. Dubrovsky is a well-mannered, intelligent person who respects a person first, and not his titles and wealth, for him serfs are not slaves, not animals, but individuals. For Troekurov, serfs are of no value; he is rude, capricious, and sometimes harsh with them. When the district court ruled that Dubrovsky's peasants would become Troekurov's property, it was natural that all of Dubrovsky's servants were indignant. People knew about Troekurov's arbitrariness and did not want to leave the former owner. Dubrovsky stopped his people when they wanted to deal with the order, who brought the decision from the county court. The peasants obeyed the master, but some of them did not submit, they understood that the decision would be fulfilled and it was in their power to change their fate.

At night young master Vladimir Dubrovsky set fire to his house, a riot was also ripening in it, and the peasants supported him. The house with the sleeping shop assistants was on fire, and the cat was rushing about on the roof of the barn. Blacksmith Arkhip, one of the most courageous rebels, risking his life, saved the animal. Why is cruelty and weakness so combined in people? I think that a person protests against violence, injustice, evil, and when humane arguments do not lead to a positive result, he understands that he cannot win without a cold and prudent struggle. And the innocent, the weak, the downtrodden, if you need to be protected more strongly, so those who had a highly developed sense of freedom and justice went with Dubrovsky into the forest.

After the fire appeared in the vicinity a group of robbers plundered and burned the landowners' houses. At the head of this gang was Dubrovsky. Those who wanted freedom got it, those who wanted to fight for their rights became forest robbers. A. S. Pushkin, who all his life hated the injustice, emptiness and "savagery" of the nobility, in the novel "Dubrovsky" brought to the fore one of the representatives of the provincial nobility - an ambitious, noble rebel who suffered from his own condition, young Dubrovsky. The tyranny and despotism of the noble Mr. Troekurov leads to the fact that the old Mr. Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky dies. His estate is illegally awarded to Troekurov. From that moment on, a conflict develops, a rebellion is brewing in the souls of Dubrovsky's peasants. Young Vladimir Dubrovsky idealized by Pushkin. This is how he sees the hero-liberator, a fighter for truth and justice. The young nobleman is endowed with the features of a typical romantic hero: smart, educated, noble, courageous, kind, stately, handsome. His relations with the peasants of everyday life are built on devotion and trust. The protest of the peasants against the tyranny of Troekurov resonates in the heart of Dubrovsky. They are driven by a sense of revenge for the death of Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky, they hate government officials who can only work for rich, dishonest local "idols".

Revolt in the soul of the people almost always turns into a real fight. Therefore, according to the laws of the adventurous-adventure genre, the popular uprising acquires an underground character, an unknown gang noble robbers plunders and burns the estates of the landlords. Vladimir Dubrovsky is in love with the daughter of his enemy, so he refuses to take revenge on Troekurov. Pushkin increases the conflict with the wedding of Masha Troekurova and the summer prince of Vereisky and the support of this marriage by the girl's father. Dubrovsky is desperately trying to win back his love, but is too late. Masha is married, Dubrovsky is wounded. The last detail serves as a plot justification for the rebel war to take on a massive character.

A. S. Pushkin depicted life and customs provincial nobility with idealized moral and moral principles of the ancient nobility. He contrasted honesty with meanness, generosity with greed, love with hate, restraint with revelry.

Revolt of the people in Pushkin's story "Dubrovsky"

A. S. Pushkin, who all his life hated the injustice, emptiness and "savagery" of the nobility, in the novel "Dubrovsky" brought to the fore one of the representatives of the provincial nobility - an ambitious, noble rebel who suffered from his own estate, young Dubrovsky.

The tyranny and despotism of the noble master Troekurov leads to the fact that the old gentleman Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky dies. His estate is illegally awarded to Troekurov. From that moment on, a conflict develops, a rebellion is brewing in the souls of Dubrovsky's peasants. Young Vladimir Dubrovsky is idealized by Pushkin. This is how he sees the hero-liberator, a fighter for truth and justice. The young nobleman is endowed with the features of a typical romantic hero: smart, educated, noble, brave, kind, stately, handsome. His relationship with the peasants is built on loyalty and trust. The protest of the peasants against the tyranny of Troekurov resonates in the heart of Dubrovsky. They are driven by a sense of revenge for the death of Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky, they hate the state, able to work only for rich, dishonest local "idols".

Rebellion in the soul of the people almost always "results in a real struggle. Therefore, according to the laws of the adventurous-adventure genre, the popular uprising takes on an underground character, an unknown gang of noble robbers rob and burn the landowners' estates. Vladimir Dubrovsky is in love with the daughter of his enemy, therefore he refuses to take revenge on Troekurov "Pushkin aggravates the conflict with the wedding of Masha Troekurova and the elderly Prince Vereisky and the support of this marriage by the girl's father. Dubrovsky is desperately trying to win back his love, but is late. Masha is married, Dubrovsky is wounded. The last detail serves as a plot justification for the rebel war to take on a mass character.

A. S. Pushkin depicted the life and customs of the provincial nobility with the idealized moral and moral foundations of the ancient nobility. He contrasted honesty with meanness, generosity with greed, love with hate, restraint with revelry.

In his novel "Dubrovsky" A. S. Pushkin described the life of serfs, the tyranny of the landlords. He talks about a quarrel between two neighbors, landowners Troekurov and Dubrovsky. Dubrovsky is a well-mannered, intelligent person who respects, first of all, a person, and not his titles and wealth, for him serfs are not slaves, not animals, but individuals. For Troekurov, serfs are of no value; he is rude, wayward, and sometimes cruel with them.

When the district court ruled that Dubrovsky's peasants would become Troekurov's property, it was natural that all of Dubrovsky's servants were indignant. People knew about Troekurov's arbitrariness and did not want to leave the former owner. Dubrovsky stopped his people when they wanted to deal with the clerks who brought the decision from the county court. The peasants obeyed the master, but some of them did not reconcile themselves, they understood that the decision would be fulfilled and it was in their power to change their fate.

At night, the young master Vladimir Dubrovsky set fire to his house, a riot was also ripening in it, and the peasants supported him. The house with the sleeping shop assistants was on fire, and the cat was rushing about on the roof of the barn. Blacksmith Arkhip, one of the most courageous rebels, risking his life, saved the animal. Why is cruelty and kindness so combined in people? I think because a person protests against violence, injustice, evil, and when humane arguments do not lead to a positive result, he understands that he cannot win without a cold and prudent struggle. And the innocent, the weak, the downtrodden, if you are stronger, you need to protect. Therefore, those who had a strongly developed sense of freedom and justice went with Dubrovsky into the forest.

After the fire, a group of robbers appeared in the vicinity, which robbed and burned the landowners' houses. At the head of this gang was Dubrovsky. Those who wanted freedom got it, those who wanted to fight for their rights became forest robbers.

It was not easy for the peasants to live during the time described by A. S. Pushkin in the story "Dubrovsky" - the time of serfdom. Very often the landowners treated them cruelly and unfairly.

It was especially hard for serfs among such landowners as Troekurov. The wealth and noble family of Troekurov gave him great power over people and the ability to satisfy any desires. People for this spoiled and uneducated person were toys that did not have a soul or their own will (and not only serfs). He kept under lock and key the maids who were supposed to do needlework, forcibly married them off at his own discretion. At the same time, the landowner's dogs fared better than people. Kirila Petrovich dealt with the peasants and courtyards "strictly and capriciously", they were afraid of the master, but hoped for his patronage in relations with their neighbors.

A completely different relationship developed with the serfs of Troekurov's neighbor, Andrey Gavrilovich Dubrovsky. The peasants loved and respected their master, they sincerely experienced his illness and waited with hope for the arrival of Andrei Gavrilovich's son, young Vladimir Dubrovsky.

It so happened that a quarrel between former friends - Dubrovsky and Troekurov - led to the transfer of the property of the first (together with the house and serfs) to Troekurov. Ultimately, Andrei Gavrilovich, who had a hard time surviving the insult of his neighbor and the unfair decision of the court, dies.

The peasants of Dubrovsky are very attached to their masters and are determined not to let themselves be handed over to the power of the cruel Troyekurov. The serfs are ready to defend their masters and, having learned about the court decision and the death of the old master, raise a rebellion. Dubrovsky interceded in time for the clerks who came to explain the state of affairs after the transfer of property. The peasants had already gathered to knit Shabashkin, police chief and deputy zemstvo court, shouting: “Guys! down with them! ”When the young master stopped them, explaining that the peasants could harm both themselves and him with their actions.

The clerks made a mistake by staying overnight in Dubrovsky's house, because the people, although they calmed down, did not forgive the injustice. When the young gentleman went around the house at night, he met Arkhip with an ax, who at first explained that he "came ... to see if everyone was at home," but after that he honestly admitted his deepest desire: "all at once, and the ends in water". Dubrovsky understands that things have gone too far, he himself is put in a hopeless situation, deprived of his estate and lost his father due to the tyranny of a neighbor, but he is also sure that "not the clerks are to blame."

Dubrovsky decided to burn down his house so that strangers would not get it, and orders to take his nanny and other people who remained in the house, except for the clerks, into the yard.

When the courtyards, on the orders of the master, set fire to the house. Vladimir was worried about the clerks: it seemed to him that he had locked the door to their room, and they would not be able to get out of the fire. He asks Arkhip to go check if the door is open, with an order to unlock it if it is closed. However, Arkhip has his own opinion on this matter. He blames the events on the people who brought the evil news, and firmly locks the door. The clerks are doomed to death. This act can characterize the blacksmith Arkhip as a cruel and ruthless person, but it is he who, after a while, climbs onto the roof, not being afraid of fire, in order to save the cat distraught with fear. It is he who reproaches the boys rejoicing in unexpected fun: "You are not afraid of God: God's creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing."

Blacksmith Arkhip is a strong man, but he lacks education to understand the full depth and gravity of the current situation.

Not all serfs had the determination and courage to bring the work they started to the end. Only a few people disappeared from Kistenevka after the fire: the blacksmith Arkhip, the nanny Egorovna, the blacksmith Anton and the yard man Grigory. And, of course, Vladimir Dubrovsky, who wanted to restore justice and saw no other way out for himself.

In the vicinity, instilling fear in the landowners, robbers appeared who robbed the landowners' houses and burned them. Dubrovsky became the leader of the robbers, he "was famous for his intelligence, courage and some kind of generosity." Guilty peasants and serfs, tortured by the cruelty of their masters, fled into the forest and also joined the detachment of "people's avengers".

Thus, Troekurov’s quarrel with old Dubrovsky served only as a match that managed to ignite the flame of popular discontent with the injustice and tyranny of the landowners, forcing the peasants to enter into an uncompromising struggle with their oppressors.

It was not easy for the peasants to live during the time described by A. S. Pushkin in the story "Dubrovsky" - the time of serfdom. Very often the landowners treated them cruelly and unfairly. It was especially hard for serfs among such landowners as Troekurov. The wealth and noble family of Troekurov gave him great power over people and the ability to satisfy any desires. People for this spoiled and uneducated person were toys that did not have a soul or their own will (and not only serfs). He kept under lock and key the maids who were supposed to do needlework, forcibly married them off at his own discretion. At the same time, the landowner's dogs fared better than people. Kirila Petrovich dealt with the peasants and courtyards "strictly and capriciously", they were afraid of the master, but hoped for his patronage in relations with their neighbors. A completely different relationship developed with the serfs of Troekurov's neighbor, Andrey Gavrilovich Dubrovsky. The peasants loved and respected their master, they sincerely experienced his illness and waited with hope for the arrival of Andrei Gavrilovich's son, young Vladimir Dubrovsky. It so happened that a quarrel between former friends - Dubrovsky and Troekurov - led to the transfer of the property of the first (together with the house and serfs) to Troekurov. Ultimately, Andrei Gavrilovich, who had a hard time surviving the insult of his neighbor and the unfair decision of the court, dies. The peasants of Dubrovsky are very attached to their masters and are determined not to let themselves be handed over to the power of the cruel Troyekurov. The serfs are ready to defend their masters and, having learned about the court decision and the death of the old master, raise a rebellion. Dubrovsky interceded in time for the clerks who came to explain the state of affairs after the transfer of property. The peasants had already gathered to knit Shabashkin, police chief and deputy zemstvo court, shouting: “Guys! down with them! ”When the young master stopped them, explaining that the peasants could harm both themselves and him with their actions. The clerks made a mistake by staying overnight in Dubrovsky's house, because the people, although they calmed down, did not forgive the injustice. When the young gentleman went around the house at night, he met Arkhip with an ax, who at first explained that he "came ... to see if everyone was at home," but after that he honestly admitted his deepest desire: "all at once, and the ends in water." Dubrovsky understands that things have gone too far, he himself is put in a hopeless situation, deprived of his estate and lost his father due to the tyranny of a neighbor, but he is also sure that "not the clerks are to blame." Dubrovsky decided to burn down his house so that strangers would not get it, and orders to take his nanny and other people who remained in the house, except for the clerks, into the yard. When the courtyards, on the orders of the master, set fire to the house. Vladimir was worried about the clerks: it seemed to him that he had locked the door to their room, and they would not be able to get out of the fire. He asks Arkhip to go check if the door is open, with an order to unlock it if it is closed. However, Arkhip has his own opinion on this matter. He blames the events on the people who brought the evil news, and firmly locks the door. The clerks are doomed to death. This act can characterize the blacksmith Arkhip as a cruel and ruthless person, but it is he who, after a while, climbs onto the roof, not being afraid of fire, in order to save the cat distraught with fear. It is he who reproaches the boys rejoicing in unexpected fun: "You are not afraid of God: God's creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing." Blacksmith Arkhip is a strong man, but he lacks education to understand the full depth and gravity of the current situation. Not all serfs had the determination and courage to bring the work they started to the end. Only a few people disappeared from Kistenevka after the fire: the blacksmith Arkhip, the nanny Egorovna, the blacksmith Anton and the yard man Grigory. And, of course, Vladimir Dubrovsky, who wanted to restore justice and saw no other way out for himself. In the vicinity, instilling fear in the landowners, robbers appeared who robbed the landowners' houses and burned them. Dubrovsky became the leader of the robbers, he "was famous for his intelligence, courage and some kind of generosity." Guilty peasants and serfs, tortured by the cruelty of their masters, fled into the forest and also joined the detachment of "people's avengers". Thus, Troekurov's quarrel with old Dubrovsky served only as a match that managed to ignite the flame of popular discontent with the injustice and tyranny of the landowners, forcing the peasants to enter into an uncompromising struggle with their oppressors.

July 16 2015

It was not easy for the peasants to live during the time described by A.S. Pushkin in the story “Dubrovsky” - the time of serfdom. Very often the landowners treated them cruelly and unfairly. It was especially hard for serfs among such landowners as Troekurov. The wealth and nobility of the Troekurov family gave him great power over people and the ability to satisfy any desires. People for this spoiled and uneducated person were toys that did not have a soul or their own will (and not only serfs).

He. kept under lock and key the maids who were supposed to do needlework, forcibly married them off at his own discretion. At the same time, the landowner's dogs fared better than people. Kirila Petrovich treated the peasants and courtyards “strictly and capriciously”, they were afraid of the master, but they hoped for his patronage in relations with their neighbors. A completely different relationship developed with the serfs of Troekurov's neighbor, Andrey Gavrilovich Dubrovsky.

The peasants loved and respected their master, they sincerely experienced his illness and waited with hope for the arrival of Andrei Gavrilovich's son, young Vladimir Dubrovsky. It so happened that a quarrel between former friends - Dubrovsky and Troekurov - led to the transfer of the property of the first (together with the house and serfs) to Troekurov. Ultimately, Andrei Gavrilovich, who had a hard time surviving the insult of his neighbor and the unfair decision of the court, dies. The peasants of Dubrovsky are very attached to their masters and are determined not to allow themselves to be handed over to the cruel Troekurov.

The serfs are ready to defend their masters and, having learned about the court decision and the death of the old master, raise a rebellion. Dubrovsky interceded in time for the clerks who came to explain the state of affairs after the transfer of property. The peasants had already gathered to knit Shabashkin, police chief and deputy zemstvo court, shouting: “Guys! down with them!” when the young master stopped them, explaining that by their actions the peasants could harm both themselves and him. The clerks made a mistake by staying overnight in Dubrovsky's house, because the people, although they calmed down, did not forgive the injustice. When the young gentleman walked around the house at night, he met Arkhip with an ax, who at first explained that he “came ...

was to see if everyone was at home, ”but after that he honestly admitted his deepest desire:“ everyone would be at once, and ends in the water. Dubrovsky understands that things have gone too far, he himself is put in a hopeless situation, deprived of his estate and lost his father due to the tyranny of a neighbor, but he is also sure that “not the clerks are to blame.” Dubrovsky decided to burn down his house so that strangers would not get it, and orders to take his nanny and other people who remained in the house, except for the clerks, into the yard.

When the servants, on the orders of the master, set fire to the house, Vladimir became worried about the servants: it seemed to him that he had locked the door to their room, and they would not be able to get out of the fire. He asks Arkhip to go check if the door is open, with an order to unlock it if it is closed. However, this text is for private use only. 2005 Arkhip has his own opinion on this matter. He blames the events on the people who brought the evil news, and firmly locks the door. The clerks are doomed to death.

This act can characterize the blacksmith Arkhip as a cruel and ruthless person, but it is he who, after a while, climbs onto the roof, not being afraid of fire, in order to save the cat distraught with fear. It is he who reproaches the boys, rejoicing in unexpected fun: "You are not afraid of God: God's creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing." The blacksmith Arkhip is strong, but he lacks the education to understand the full depth and seriousness of the current situation.

Not all serfs had the determination and courage to bring the work they started to the end. Only a few people disappeared from Kistenevka after the fire: the blacksmith Arkhip, the nanny Egorovna, the blacksmith Anton and the yard man Grigory. And, of course, Vladimir Dubrovsky, who wanted to restore justice and saw no other way out for himself. In the vicinity, instilling fear in the landowners, robbers appeared who robbed the landowners' houses and burned them. Dubrovsky became the leader of the robbers, he "was famous for his intelligence, courage and some kind of generosity."

Guilty peasants and serfs, tortured by the cruelty of their masters, fled into the forest and also joined the detachment of "people's avengers". Thus, Troekurov's quarrel with old Dubrovsky served only as a match that managed to ignite the flame of popular discontent with the injustice and tyranny of the landowners, forcing the peasants to enter into an uncompromising struggle with their oppressors.

Need a cheat sheet? Then save it - "Rebellion of the peasants in the story of A. S. Pushkin" Dubrovsky ". Literary writings!